FrontierLab
A research filter, not a predictor — not financial advice. Grades rank growth stocks on evidence-based quality signals from end-of-day data; they are not buy/sell calls or price forecasts. Always do your own research.

Planet Labs PBC PL

Mixed (early)   Space sector · Daily satellite imagery of the whole Earth, sold by subscription.

🗓 Reports earnings in 64 days (2026-12-09) — calendar context, not a prediction.

Planet Labs PBC (PL) is an early-stage Space company, graded Mixed (early) on FrontierLab's evidence-based quality rubric (data as of 2026-10-05). Revenue grew 44.1% year-over-year at a 55.4% gross margin. Gross-profits-to-assets is 0.15; Rule of 40 is 16.9. Net share issuance 18.2% YoY (heavy issuance). 3 risk flags are noted below. Analyst mix: 15 buy / 4 hold / 0 sell. Track record: 27% of Early-stage-graded names beat the S&P over 63 sessions (95% CI 15–44%, N=33). Median excess vs the S&P was -14.6%.

These sentences are generated from the day's data by deterministic templates.

Key quality signals

Revenue growth (YoY)44.1%
Gross margin55.4%
Gross profits / assets0.15
Rule of 4016.9
Net margin-27.2%
Cash runway (months)—
PEG—
Price / sales15.4

Quality checklist

Each line is one quality test behind the grade — ✓ passed · ~ borderline · ✗ failed. Hover a metric in the tables below for what it means.

Grade history

Every grade change since FrontierLab began tracking this name — the receipts behind the current grade.

How have Early-stage-graded names performed?

The forward returns of all Early-stage-graded names since each grade was recorded — the bucket this name currently sits in, not a forecast of this individual stock.

WindowForward record vs the S&PMedian
~1 month45% of Early-stage-graded names beat the S&P over 21 sessions (95% CI 29–62%, N=31).Median excess vs the S&P was -3.2%.
~3 months27% of Early-stage-graded names beat the S&P over 63 sessions (95% CI 15–44%, N=33).Median excess vs the S&P was -14.6%.
~6 monthsbuilding — 46 more sessions needed

How have this name's flags scored?

FlagNMean excess vs S&P
Burning cash — operating margin is negative.36-6.5%
Heavy dilution (~18%/yr) — top-decile share issuers have historically underperformed.sample still too small to report (need ≥ 8)
Hyper-expansion — assets up ~106% in a year; aggressive expanders have historically lagged.sample still too small to report (need ≥ 8)

These per-flag figures are observational — a flag firing is not a randomized assignment, so any edge can reflect what kind of names trip a flag, not the flag itself. Descriptive, not causal.

Scope: these are forward returns vs the S&P among names still covered at each horizon's end, within the curated universe — not a survivorship-clean whole-market backtest. Names later dropped from coverage are counted as attrition (not hidden), and single-session moves beyond ±300% are treated as split/data artifacts and excluded. How this is measured → · Full track record →

How it compares

Revenue growth: about mid-pack vs peers across all sectors (N=22)

Coarse same-sector, same-stage context — not a percentile or rank. GP/A is graded on its absolute level, not position.

Fundamentals

Market cap$5.83B
StageEarly
Share issuance (YoY)18.2% · heavy issuance
MoatNarrow
TAMMOD
P/E (trailing)—
EPS (trailing)$-1.10
Burn multiple—
Gross-margin trend (pts)-3.5
Cash / assets0.6
Accruals (%)-44.9%
Net debt / EBITDA—
Statements as ofQ2 FY2027 · filed 2026-09-03

Momentum context — describes the past, not a signal

52-week range
$10.52$51.76

Low reached Nov 21, 2025 · high reached May 28, 2026 — by daily close.

Price$17.50 (as of 2026-10-02)
Last session move—
% off 52-wk high-66.2%
RSI (14)47
Relative volume1.2×

Risk flags

Burning cash — operating margin is negative.Heavy dilution (~18%/yr) — top-decile share issuers have historically underperformed.Hyper-expansion — assets up ~106% in a year; aggressive expanders have historically lagged.

Positive signals

Growth accelerating — revenue growth sped up ~33 points year-on-year; acceleration is an early fundamental tell (annual data, so it's coarse).

Insider activity (90 days)

Cluster buyers0
Sellers6

Insider selling is routine diversification, not a bearish signal.

Analyst mix

Strong buy5
Buy10
Hold4
Sell0
Strong sell0

Ratings are context, not a price target. "Momentum" = how the mix changed over recent weeks, not a forecast.

From the headlines

Planet Labs shares surge; SpaceX lockup expirations and fresh catalysts noted in sector.

AI take — daily, AI-generated

AI leans mixed

Planet Labs shows solid growth (44.1%) and healthy gross margins (55.4%), but mixed-grade rating and unclear runway suggest the recent surge is riding sector momentum rather than company-specific catalysts; wait for clearer unit economics.

Generated by an AI model from the day's news — an opinion for context only. Not financial advice, not a recommendation, and not a price target.

Similar Space names

Rocket Lab USA, Inc.AST SpaceMobile, Inc.Redwire CorpIntuitive Machines, Inc.

← All Space names · Open PL in the interactive screener →

Data as of 2026-10-05 08:19 (end-of-day). How grades are computed →