A research filter, not a predictor — not financial advice. Grades rank growth stocks on evidence-based quality signals from end-of-day data; they are not buy/sell calls or price forecasts. Always do your own research.

Ouster, Inc. OUST

Promising (early) Emerging Frontier sector · Ouster — digital lidar sensors for industrial, robotics and automotive use.

Ouster, Inc. (OUST) is an early-stage Emerging Frontier company, graded Promising (early) on FrontierLab's evidence-based quality rubric (data as of 2026-10-05). Revenue grew 62.8% year-over-year at a 49.6% gross margin. Gross-profits-to-assets is 0.21; Rule of 40 is 32.2. Net share issuance 23.4% YoY (heavy issuance). 3 risk flags are noted below. Analyst mix: 11 buy / 2 hold / 0 sell. Track record: 27% of Early-stage-graded names beat the S&P over 63 sessions (95% CI 15–44%, N=33). Median excess vs the S&P was -14.6%.

These sentences are generated from the day's data by deterministic templates.

Key quality signals

Revenue growth (YoY)	62.8%
Gross margin	49.6%
Gross profits / assets	0.21
Rule of 40	32.2
Net margin	-30.6%
Cash runway (months)	58.2
PEG	—
Price / sales	15.6

Quality checklist

Each line is one quality test behind the grade — ✓ passed · ~ borderline · ✗ failed. Hover a metric in the tables below for what it means.

~ Revenue growth — 62.8% (pass ≥ 20%)
✓ Capital efficiency
✓ Gross margin — 49.6% (pass ≥ 45% · Emerging Frontier)
✓ Gross-margin trend — 7.3 (pass ≥ 2)
✓ Share dilution — 23.4%
✗ Competitive moat — None
~ Market size (TAM) — Mod

Grade history

2026-08-10 — Promising (early) (from Insufficient)
2026-08-03 — Insufficient (from Promising (early))
2026-06-10 — Promising (early) (first graded)

Every grade change since FrontierLab began tracking this name — the receipts behind the current grade.

How have Early-stage-graded names performed?

The forward returns of all Early-stage-graded names since each grade was recorded — the bucket this name currently sits in, not a forecast of this individual stock.

Window	Forward record vs the S&P	Median
~1 month	45% of Early-stage-graded names beat the S&P over 21 sessions (95% CI 29–62%, N=31).	Median excess vs the S&P was -3.2%.
~3 months	27% of Early-stage-graded names beat the S&P over 63 sessions (95% CI 15–44%, N=33).	Median excess vs the S&P was -14.6%.
~6 months	building — 46 more sessions needed

How have this name's flags scored?

Flag	N	Mean excess vs S&P
Burning cash — operating margin is negative.	36	-6.5%
Heavy dilution (~23%/yr) — top-decile share issuers have historically underperformed.	sample still too small to report (need ≥ 8)
Hyper-expansion — assets up ~48% in a year; aggressive expanders have historically lagged.	sample still too small to report (need ≥ 8)

These per-flag figures are observational — a flag firing is not a randomized assignment, so any edge can reflect what kind of names trip a flag, not the flag itself. Descriptive, not causal.

Scope: these are forward returns vs the S&P among names still covered at each horizon's end, within the curated universe — not a survivorship-clean whole-market backtest. Names later dropped from coverage are counted as attrition (not hidden), and single-session moves beyond ±300% are treated as split/data artifacts and excluded. How this is measured → · Full track record →

How it compares

Revenue growth: about mid-pack vs Emerging Frontier peers (N=8)

Gross margin: higher than most Emerging Frontier peers (N=8)

Coarse same-sector, same-stage context — not a percentile or rank. GP/A is graded on its absolute level, not position.

Fundamentals

Market cap	$3.20B
Stage	Early
Share issuance (YoY)	23.4% · heavy issuance
Moat	None
TAM	MOD
P/E (trailing)	—
EPS (trailing)	$-0.86
Burn multiple	0.3
Gross-margin trend (pts)	7.3
Cash / assets	0.55
Accruals (%)	0.1%
Net debt / EBITDA	—
Statements as of	Q2 FY2026 · filed 2026-08-06

Momentum context — describes the past, not a signal

52-week range

$16.4$63.79

Low reached Mar 30, 2026 · high reached Jun 30, 2026 — by daily close.

Price	$44.39 (as of 2026-10-02)
Last session move	—
% off 52-wk high	-30.4%
RSI (14)	63
Relative volume	1.4×

Risk flags

Burning cash — operating margin is negative.Heavy dilution (~23%/yr) — top-decile share issuers have historically underperformed.Hyper-expansion — assets up ~48% in a year; aggressive expanders have historically lagged.

Positive signals

Growth accelerating — revenue growth sped up ~37 points year-on-year; acceleration is an early fundamental tell (annual data, so it's coarse).

Insider activity (90 days)

Cluster buyers	0
Sellers	7

Insider selling is routine diversification, not a bearish signal.

Analyst mix

Strong buy	3
Buy	8
Hold	2
Sell	0
Strong sell	0

Ratings are context, not a price target. "Momentum" = how the mix changed over recent weeks, not a forecast.

From the headlines

AI take — daily, AI-generated

AI leans positive

Strong growth (62.8%), excellent margins (49.6%), and solid profitability per asset (0.21) make this the most fundamentally sound name on the list; early-stage risk remains but the metrics support conviction.

Generated by an AI model from the day's news — an opinion for context only. Not financial advice, not a recommendation, and not a price target.

Similar Emerging Frontier names

Centrus Energy Corp.Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.SoundHound AI, Inc.Nano Nuclear Energy Inc.Absci Corporation

← All Emerging Frontier names · Open OUST in the interactive screener →

Data as of 2026-10-05 08:19 (end-of-day). How grades are computed →