DoorDash, Inc. DASH
Strong Consumer Tech sector · DoorDash — US food-delivery leader expanding into broader local commerce.
DoorDash, Inc. (DASH) is an established Consumer Tech company, graded Strong on FrontierLab's evidence-based quality rubric (data as of 2026-10-05). Revenue grew 33.6% year-over-year at a 51.4% gross margin. Gross-profits-to-assets is 0.42; Rule of 40 is 39.9. Net share issuance 0.2% YoY (flat share count). No risk flags are currently noted. Track record: 55% of Strong-graded names beat the S&P over 63 sessions (95% CI 38–72%, N=29). Median excess vs the S&P was +2.2%.
These sentences are generated from the day's data by deterministic templates.
Key quality signals
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 33.6% |
|---|---|
| Gross margin | 51.4% |
| Gross profits / assets | 0.42 |
| Rule of 40 | 39.9 |
| Net margin | 6.3% |
| Cash runway (months) | — |
| PEG | 15.5 |
| Price / sales | 5.2 |
Quality checklist
Each line is one quality test behind the grade — ✓ passed · ~ borderline · ✗ failed. Hover a metric in the tables below for what it means.
- ~ Revenue growth — 33.6% (pass ≥ 20%)
- ✓ Gross profits / assets — 0.42 (pass ≥ 0.33)
- · Rule of 40 — 39.9 (context — graded for software only)
- ✓ Gross margin — 51.4% (pass ≥ 38% · Consumer Tech)
- ✓ Cash generation
- ✓ Share dilution — 0.2%
- ~ Competitive moat — Narrow
- ✓ Market size (TAM) — Large
Grade history
Graded Strong since 2026-06-10 — no grade changes recorded yet.
How have Strong-graded names performed?
The forward returns of all Strong-graded names since each grade was recorded — the bucket this name currently sits in, not a forecast of this individual stock.
| Window | Forward record vs the S&P | Median |
|---|---|---|
| ~1 month | 50% of Strong-graded names beat the S&P over 21 sessions (95% CI 33–67%, N=30). | Median excess vs the S&P was +0.9%. |
| ~3 months | 55% of Strong-graded names beat the S&P over 63 sessions (95% CI 38–72%, N=29). | Median excess vs the S&P was +2.2%. |
| ~6 months | building — 46 more sessions needed | |
Scope: these are forward returns vs the S&P among names still covered at each horizon's end, within the curated universe — not a survivorship-clean whole-market backtest. Names later dropped from coverage are counted as attrition (not hidden), and single-session moves beyond ±300% are treated as split/data artifacts and excluded. How this is measured → · Full track record →
How it compares
Coarse same-sector, same-stage context — not a percentile or rank. GP/A is graded on its absolute level, not position.
Fundamentals
| Market cap | $82.42B |
|---|---|
| Stage | Established |
| Share issuance (YoY) | 0.2% · flat share count |
| Moat | Narrow |
| TAM | LARGE |
| P/E (trailing) | 99 |
| EPS (trailing) | $1.91 |
| Burn multiple | — |
| Gross-margin trend (pts) | 1.4 |
| Cash / assets | 0.27 |
| Accruals (%) | -10.9% |
| Net debt / EBITDA | -0.6 |
| Statements as of | Q2 FY2026 · filed 2026-08-05 |
Momentum context — describes the past, not a signal
Low reached Mar 27, 2026 · high reached Oct 6, 2025 — by daily close.
| Price | $189.15 (as of 2026-10-02) |
|---|---|
| Last session move | — |
| % off 52-wk high | -33.7% |
| RSI (14) | 43 |
| Relative volume | 1× |
Positive signals
Insider activity (90 days)
| Cluster buyers | 0 |
|---|---|
| Sellers | 8 |
Insider selling is routine diversification, not a bearish signal.
From the headlines
Gig worker pressure from gas prices and customer spending; AI disruption debate.
AI take — daily, AI-generated
AI leans cautious
Strong 33.6% growth and 51.4% margin are undermined by a PEG of 15.5 (extremely expensive), gig-economy headwinds, and 100% retail bullishness suggesting hype over fundamentals.
Generated by an AI model from the day's news — an opinion for context only. Not financial advice, not a recommendation, and not a price target.
Similar Consumer Tech names
← All Consumer Tech names · Open DASH in the interactive screener →
Data as of 2026-10-05 08:19 (end-of-day). How grades are computed →