CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. CRWD
Promising (early) Artificial Intelligence sector · Cloud-native security platform with an expanding AI layer.
🗓 Reports earnings in 56 days (2026-12-01) — calendar context, not a prediction.
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) is an Artificial Intelligence company, graded Promising (early) on FrontierLab's evidence-based quality rubric (data as of 2026-10-05). Revenue grew 24.3% year-over-year at a 75.2% gross margin. Gross-profits-to-assets is 0.34; Rule of 40 is 22.1. Net share issuance 3.8% YoY (modest issuance). 2 risk flags are noted below. Analyst mix: 45 buy / 14 hold / 2 sell. Track record: 27% of Early-stage-graded names beat the S&P over 63 sessions (95% CI 15–44%, N=33). Median excess vs the S&P was -14.6%.
These sentences are generated from the day's data by deterministic templates.
Key quality signals
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 24.3% |
|---|---|
| Gross margin | 75.2% |
| Gross profits / assets | 0.34 |
| Rule of 40 | 22.1 |
| Net margin | -2.2% |
| Cash runway (months) | — |
| PEG | — |
| Price / sales | 51 |
Quality checklist
Each line is one quality test behind the grade — ✓ passed · ~ borderline · ✗ failed. Hover a metric in the tables below for what it means.
- ~ Revenue growth — 24.3% (pass ≥ 20%)
- ✓ Capital efficiency
- ✓ Gross margin — 75.2% (pass ≥ 60% · Artificial Intelligence)
- ~ Gross-margin trend — 1.2 (pass ≥ 2)
- ✓ Share dilution — 3.8%
- ✓ Competitive moat — Wide
- ✓ Market size (TAM) — Large
Grade history
Graded Promising (early) since 2026-06-10 — no grade changes recorded yet.
How have Early-stage-graded names performed?
The forward returns of all Early-stage-graded names since each grade was recorded — the bucket this name currently sits in, not a forecast of this individual stock.
| Window | Forward record vs the S&P | Median |
|---|---|---|
| ~1 month | 45% of Early-stage-graded names beat the S&P over 21 sessions (95% CI 29–62%, N=31). | Median excess vs the S&P was -3.2%. |
| ~3 months | 27% of Early-stage-graded names beat the S&P over 63 sessions (95% CI 15–44%, N=33). | Median excess vs the S&P was -14.6%. |
| ~6 months | building — 46 more sessions needed | |
How have this name's flags scored?
| Flag | N | Mean excess vs S&P |
|---|---|---|
| Burning cash — operating margin is negative. | 36 | -6.5% |
| Parabolic one-day spike (+14%) in the last month — extreme single-day moves tend to mean-revert. | sample still too small to report (need ≥ 8) | |
These per-flag figures are observational — a flag firing is not a randomized assignment, so any edge can reflect what kind of names trip a flag, not the flag itself. Descriptive, not causal.
Scope: these are forward returns vs the S&P among names still covered at each horizon's end, within the curated universe — not a survivorship-clean whole-market backtest. Names later dropped from coverage are counted as attrition (not hidden), and single-session moves beyond ±300% are treated as split/data artifacts and excluded. How this is measured → · Full track record →
How it compares
Coarse same-sector, same-stage context — not a percentile or rank. GP/A is graded on its absolute level, not position.
Fundamentals
| Market cap | $274.97B |
|---|---|
| Stage | Early |
| Share issuance (YoY) | 3.8% · modest issuance |
| Moat | Wide |
| TAM | LARGE |
| P/E (trailing) | 7693.4 |
| EPS (trailing) | $0.04 |
| Burn multiple | — |
| Gross-margin trend (pts) | 1.2 |
| Cash / assets | 0.42 |
| Accruals (%) | -18.4% |
| Net debt / EBITDA | -9.6 |
| Statements as of | Q2 FY2027 · filed 2026-08-27 |
Momentum context — describes the past, not a signal
Low reached Feb 24, 2026 · high reached Oct 2, 2026 — by daily close.
| Price | $270.04 (as of 2026-10-02) |
|---|---|
| Last session move | — |
| % off 52-wk high | -1.3% |
| RSI (14) | 69 |
| Relative volume | 0.6× |
Risk flags
Insider activity (90 days)
| Cluster buyers | 0 |
|---|---|
| Sellers | 9 |
Insider selling is routine diversification, not a bearish signal.
Analyst mix
| Strong buy | 12 |
|---|---|
| Buy | 33 |
| Hold | 14 |
| Sell | 1 |
| Strong sell | 1 |
Ratings are context, not a price target. "Momentum" = how the mix changed over recent weeks, not a forecast.
From the headlines
CrowdStrike at 52-week highs with strong revenue growth; AI model challenges noted by leadership.
- Why Did NVDA, HPE, CRWD Stocks Rise To 52-Week Highs Last Week?
- Salesforce vs. CrowdStrike: What Revenue Growth Trends for These Software Giants Tell Investors
- Issues with AI models only going to get worse, says CrowdStrike President Michael Sentonas
AI take — daily, AI-generated
AI leans mixed
Solid margins (75%) and 52-week highs show strength, but 24% growth with rising dilution (13%) and a missing PEG make it hard to justify the 71% bullish crowd; leadership's AI caution is a red flag.
Generated by an AI model from the day's news — an opinion for context only. Not financial advice, not a recommendation, and not a price target.
Similar Artificial Intelligence names
← All Artificial Intelligence names · Open CRWD in the interactive screener →
Data as of 2026-10-05 08:19 (end-of-day). How grades are computed →