FrontierLab
A research filter, not a predictor — not financial advice. Grades rank growth stocks on evidence-based quality signals from end-of-day data; they are not buy/sell calls or price forecasts. Always do your own research.

CRISPR Therapeutics AG CRSP

Caution (early)   Health Tech sector · CRISPR Therapeutics — gene-editing pioneer with its first approved therapy, early commercially.

🗓 Reports earnings in 34 days (2026-11-09) — calendar context, not a prediction.

CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP) is an early-stage Health Tech company, graded Caution (early) on FrontierLab's evidence-based quality rubric (data as of 2026-10-05). Gross-profits-to-assets is -0.08; Rule of 40 is -4035.7. Net share issuance 10.8% YoY (heavy issuance). 2 risk flags are noted below. Analyst mix: 17 buy / 11 hold / 0 sell. Track record: 27% of Early-stage-graded names beat the S&P over 63 sessions (95% CI 15–44%, N=33). Median excess vs the S&P was -14.6%.

These sentences are generated from the day's data by deterministic templates.

Key quality signals

Revenue growth (YoY)—
Gross margin—
Gross profits / assets-0.08
Rule of 40-4035.7
Net margin-3971.5%
Cash runway (months)76.8
PEG—
Price / sales399.2

Quality checklist

Each line is one quality test behind the grade — ✓ passed · ~ borderline · ✗ failed. Hover a metric in the tables below for what it means.

Grade history

Every grade change since FrontierLab began tracking this name — the receipts behind the current grade.

How have Early-stage-graded names performed?

The forward returns of all Early-stage-graded names since each grade was recorded — the bucket this name currently sits in, not a forecast of this individual stock.

WindowForward record vs the S&PMedian
~1 month45% of Early-stage-graded names beat the S&P over 21 sessions (95% CI 29–62%, N=31).Median excess vs the S&P was -3.2%.
~3 months27% of Early-stage-graded names beat the S&P over 63 sessions (95% CI 15–44%, N=33).Median excess vs the S&P was -14.6%.
~6 monthsbuilding — 46 more sessions needed

How have this name's flags scored?

FlagNMean excess vs S&P
Burning cash — operating margin is negative.36-6.5%
Heavy dilution (~11%/yr) — top-decile share issuers have historically underperformed.sample still too small to report (need ≥ 8)

These per-flag figures are observational — a flag firing is not a randomized assignment, so any edge can reflect what kind of names trip a flag, not the flag itself. Descriptive, not causal.

Scope: these are forward returns vs the S&P among names still covered at each horizon's end, within the curated universe — not a survivorship-clean whole-market backtest. Names later dropped from coverage are counted as attrition (not hidden), and single-session moves beyond ±300% are treated as split/data artifacts and excluded. How this is measured → · Full track record →

Fundamentals

Market cap$5.35B
StageEarly
Share issuance (YoY)10.8% · heavy issuance
MoatNone
TAMLARGE
P/E (trailing)—
EPS (trailing)$-4.76
Burn multiple27.6
Gross-margin trend (pts)—
Cash / assets0.89
Accruals (%)-3.5%
Net debt / EBITDA—
Statements as ofQ2 FY2026 · filed 2026-08-03

Momentum context — describes the past, not a signal

52-week range
$44.12$78.48

Low reached Mar 30, 2026 · high reached Oct 8, 2025 — by daily close.

Price$55.43 (as of 2026-10-02)
Last session move—
% off 52-wk high-29.4%
RSI (14)51
Relative volume0.7×

Risk flags

Burning cash — operating margin is negative.Heavy dilution (~11%/yr) — top-decile share issuers have historically underperformed.

Positive signals

Growth accelerating — revenue growth sped up ~17 points year-on-year; acceleration is an early fundamental tell (annual data, so it's coarse).

Insider activity (90 days)

Cluster buyers0
Sellers2

Insider selling is routine diversification, not a bearish signal.

Analyst mix

Strong buy6
Buy11
Hold11
Sell0
Strong sell0

Ratings are context, not a price target. "Momentum" = how the mix changed over recent weeks, not a forecast.

From the headlines

Clinical data presentation scheduled; Anthropic AI comparison noted; temporary weakness mentioned.

AI take — daily, AI-generated

AI leans cautious

Missing core metrics (growth, margins), negative GP/A, and 76.8-month runway suggest a cash-burn story masquerading as opportunity; clinical data is speculative and doesn't offset weak fundamentals.

Generated by an AI model from the day's news — an opinion for context only. Not financial advice, not a recommendation, and not a price target.

Similar Health Tech names

Veeva Systems Inc.Tempus AI, Inc.Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.

← All Health Tech names · Open CRSP in the interactive screener →

Data as of 2026-10-05 08:19 (end-of-day). How grades are computed →